Despite DNA, Alvarez fails to bring charges in two murders
While Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez’s alleged mishandling of the Laquan McDonald case has drawn fury from myriad critics in recent days, her equally troubling failure to prosecute men linked by DNA to two murders has received scant public attention.
While Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez’s alleged mishandling of the Laquan McDonald case has drawn fury from myriad critics in recent days, her equally troubling failure to prosecute men linked by DNA to two murders has received scant public attention.
In one of the cases, the man to whom Alvarez gave a pass — James D. Starkey, a violent recidivist with “Fuck the World” tattooed across his abdomen — has been convicted of a subsequent aggravated criminal sexual assault for which he is serving a 25-year prison sentence.
The latter crime, of course, would not have happened if Starkey had been behind bars for the earlier crime — the slaying of a drug dealer named Robert Head during a knife fight on the south side of Chicago in 2002. Under then-State’s Attorney Dick Devine, Alvarez’s predecessor, an innocent man named Maurice Patterson was convicted of the crime.
Although the DNA evidence exculpating Patterson and inculpating Starkey certainly should have been known early on to Devine’s assistant in charge of the case, Kathleen Van Kampen, it had been concealed from Patterson’s defense and from Circuit Court Judge James B. Linn, the trial judge.
The apparent murder weapon — a knife stained with the blood of the victim and an unknown person — had been found immediately after the crime near the scene. When the unknown person’s DNA profile was run through the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), he was identified as Starkey.
Van Kampen had received the CODIS report, but when Judge Linn asked her at a pretrial hearing about the knife, she responded that her “best guess” was that it wasn’t related to the crime. At the ensuing trial, based on three in-court identifications — make that misidentifications — a jury convicted Patterson, and Judge Linn sentenced him to 30 years in prison.
Alvarez bears no responsibility for what happened in the case until 2009, when Karen Daniel, of the Center on Wrongful Convictions, undertook representation of Patterson and dislodged the theretofore concealed forensic evidence. Soon, however, the case attained a sufficiently high profile in the media and within the state’s attorney’s office that Alvarez had to have known the salient facts. Yet she did not move to prosecute Starkey.
James D. Starkey was arrested in September, 2013 for aggravated sexual assault. Credit: Chicago Police Department
In September 2013, having been left at large by Alvarez, Starkey forced the homeless man into a small downtown park, threatened to kill him, and sexually assaulted him — the crime for which, as noted above, Starkey is now behind bars.
Alvarez’s rationale for not prosecuting Starkey for the Head murder is known only to her, but a decision to prosecute the case would certainly have created embarrassment for Kathleen Van Kampen, who remained in charge of the case under Alvarez at the time of Maurice Patterson’s exoneration. In the final analysis, Alvarez exercised prosecutorial discretion in the case — with most unfortunate results.
Alvarez also failed to prosecute Willie Randolph, who was identified through CODIS in 2011 as the source of semen recovered from the body of a 14-year-old girl who had been raped and murdered in south suburban Dixmoor two decades earlier.
Five teenagers — Jonathan Barr, James Harden, Shainnie Sharp, Robert Taylor, and Robert Veal — had been wrongfully convicted of the crime under then-State’s Attorney Jack O’Malley. Like Devine in the Head case, O’Malley had plausible deniability of personal knowledge of the wrongful prosecutions of the teenagers.
Alvarez, however, had no plausible explanation for failing to pursue Randolph after DNA linked him to the crime. In a 2012 Sixty Minutes interview, she branded Randolph “a bad guy” — adding, “But, can we prove, just by someone’s bad background, that they committed this particular crime? It takes much more than that.”
Of course it does — something like maybe the recovery of Randolph’s DNA from inside the victim’s body?
Republish this article for free under a Creative Commons license.
Thank you for your interest in republishing our work
We welcome and encourage other news organizations to republish our reporting on the Cook County court system. Unless otherwise noted, all our work is available for republishing under the following conditions:
Contact editor@injusticewatch.org to let us know that you are republishing our work.
Do not change the story or the headline, except for house style or to reflect changes in time or location (e.g., “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”, or “Springfield, Illinois, can be changed to “Springfield” or “here”).
Stories must include the byline of the reporter(s), including any publishing partners. We prefer the format: “By Reporter Name, Injustice Watch.”
Include this language and links at the top of the story: “This story was produced by Injustice Watch, a nonprofit newsroom in Chicago that investigates issues of equity and justice in the Cook County court system. Sign up here to get their weekly newsletter.”
Copy the HTML using this “republication tool,” including the parse.ly tracking information.
You cannot republish our photographs or illustrations without specific permission. Email editor@injusticewatch.org to request permission.
If you use canonical metadata, use the Injustice Watch URL as the canonical link.
You may include our content on webpages with ads, but you cannot sell ads specifically against our content. If you’re a nonprofit, you can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support Injustice Watch’s work.
You can’t republish our work wholesale or automatically. You must select stories to publish individually.
You can’t sell our material separately or syndicate it. This includes publishing or syndicating our work on platforms or apps, such as Apple News, Google News, etc.
If we send you a request to remove our content from your website, you must agree to do so immediately.
Please note, we will not provide indemnification if you are located or publishing outside the United States, but you may contact us to obtain a license and indemnification on a case-by-case basis.
Rob Warden was a co-founder of Injustice Watch and executive director emeritus and co-founder of the Center on Wrongful Convictions (CWC) at Northwestern University School of Law. During his 16-year tenure, the CWC was instrumental in exonerating 31 wrongfully convicted men and women in Illinois. Before launching the CWC, Rob was editor and publisher of Chicago Lawyer, where his investigations into Illinois capital cases launched a movement that culminated both in the founding of the Center in 1999 and abolition of the Illinois death penalty in 2011. His reporting at Chicago Lawyer was instrumental in 13 exonerations, including that of Gary Dotson, the nation’s first prisoner to be exonerated by DNA. Before that, Rob was a prize-winning investigative reporter for the Chicago Daily News and Washington Post. He has won more than 50 journalism awards and is the author of seven books.
Despite DNA, Alvarez fails to bring charges in two murders
Share this:
While Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez’s alleged mishandling of the Laquan McDonald case has drawn fury from myriad critics in recent days, her equally troubling failure to prosecute men linked by DNA to two murders has received scant public attention.
In one of the cases, the man to whom Alvarez gave a pass — James D. Starkey, a violent recidivist with “Fuck the World” tattooed across his abdomen — has been convicted of a subsequent aggravated criminal sexual assault for which he is serving a 25-year prison sentence.
The latter crime, of course, would not have happened if Starkey had been behind bars for the earlier crime — the slaying of a drug dealer named Robert Head during a knife fight on the south side of Chicago in 2002. Under then-State’s Attorney Dick Devine, Alvarez’s predecessor, an innocent man named Maurice Patterson was convicted of the crime.
Although the DNA evidence exculpating Patterson and inculpating Starkey certainly should have been known early on to Devine’s assistant in charge of the case, Kathleen Van Kampen, it had been concealed from Patterson’s defense and from Circuit Court Judge James B. Linn, the trial judge.
The apparent murder weapon — a knife stained with the blood of the victim and an unknown person — had been found immediately after the crime near the scene. When the unknown person’s DNA profile was run through the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), he was identified as Starkey.
Van Kampen had received the CODIS report, but when Judge Linn asked her at a pretrial hearing about the knife, she responded that her “best guess” was that it wasn’t related to the crime. At the ensuing trial, based on three in-court identifications — make that misidentifications — a jury convicted Patterson, and Judge Linn sentenced him to 30 years in prison.
Alvarez bears no responsibility for what happened in the case until 2009, when Karen Daniel, of the Center on Wrongful Convictions, undertook representation of Patterson and dislodged the theretofore concealed forensic evidence. Soon, however, the case attained a sufficiently high profile in the media and within the state’s attorney’s office that Alvarez had to have known the salient facts. Yet she did not move to prosecute Starkey.
In September 2013, having been left at large by Alvarez, Starkey forced the homeless man into a small downtown park, threatened to kill him, and sexually assaulted him — the crime for which, as noted above, Starkey is now behind bars.
Alvarez’s rationale for not prosecuting Starkey for the Head murder is known only to her, but a decision to prosecute the case would certainly have created embarrassment for Kathleen Van Kampen, who remained in charge of the case under Alvarez at the time of Maurice Patterson’s exoneration. In the final analysis, Alvarez exercised prosecutorial discretion in the case — with most unfortunate results.
Alvarez also failed to prosecute Willie Randolph, who was identified through CODIS in 2011 as the source of semen recovered from the body of a 14-year-old girl who had been raped and murdered in south suburban Dixmoor two decades earlier.
Five teenagers — Jonathan Barr, James Harden, Shainnie Sharp, Robert Taylor, and Robert Veal — had been wrongfully convicted of the crime under then-State’s Attorney Jack O’Malley. Like Devine in the Head case, O’Malley had plausible deniability of personal knowledge of the wrongful prosecutions of the teenagers.
Alvarez, however, had no plausible explanation for failing to pursue Randolph after DNA linked him to the crime. In a 2012 Sixty Minutes interview, she branded Randolph “a bad guy” — adding, “But, can we prove, just by someone’s bad background, that they committed this particular crime? It takes much more than that.”
Of course it does — something like maybe the recovery of Randolph’s DNA from inside the victim’s body?
Rob Warden
Rob Warden was a co-founder of Injustice Watch and executive director emeritus and co-founder of the Center on Wrongful Convictions (CWC) at Northwestern University School of Law. During his 16-year tenure, the CWC was instrumental in exonerating 31 wrongfully convicted men and women in Illinois. Before launching the CWC, Rob was editor and publisher of Chicago Lawyer, where his investigations into Illinois capital cases launched a movement that culminated both in the founding of the Center in 1999 and abolition of the Illinois death penalty in 2011. His reporting at Chicago Lawyer was instrumental in 13 exonerations, including that of Gary Dotson, the nation’s first prisoner to be exonerated by DNA. Before that, Rob was a prize-winning investigative reporter for the Chicago Daily News and Washington Post. He has won more than 50 journalism awards and is the author of seven books.
More by Rob Warden